Table 1.
Mean (M) and Standard Deviation (SD) of the Estimated Difference in LRP Onset From the Stimulus-Locked (S-L) Analysis and the Response-Locked R-L) Analysis of Data Involving Either a 100-ms, S-L Effect or a 100-ms, R-L Effect for Each of 36 Different Techniques
| 100-ms, Stimulus-locked effect |
100-ms, Response-locked effect |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-L analysis |
R-L analysis |
S-L analysis |
R-L analysis |
|||||
| Technique | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD |
| Single-subject procedure, baseline-deviation method | ||||||||
| SS 2.0sd | 77.7 | 54.5 | 12.8 | 44.8 | 35.7 | 46.4 | 71.5 | 40.6 |
| SS 2.5sd | 83.3 | 42.6 | 7.5 | 43.1 | 39.3 | 45.8 | 69.0 | 39.7 |
| SS 3.0sd | 94.4 | 47.4 | 8.1 | 39.6 | 42.5 | 49.5 | 65.6 | 34.4 |
| Jack-knife procedure, baseline-deviation method | ||||||||
| JK 2.0sd | 103.9 | 100.7 | –2.6 | 109.5 | 32.6 | 78.2 | 97.4 | 87.3 |
| JK 2.5sd | 100.3 | 94.3 | 3.8 | 111.9 | 30.1 | 68.9 | 79.4 | 67.0 |
| JK 3.0sd | 103.4 | 82.5 | –0.2 | 92.5 | 32.3 | 74.9 | 75.3 | 65.0 |
| JK 4.0sd | 101.6 | 54.9 | 13.4 | 51.7 | 37.6 | 43.5 | 62.6 | 48.4 |
| JK 5.0sd | 84.9 | 52.4 | 9.3 | 39.9 | 50.3 | 44.6 | 64.3 | 44.9 |
| JK 6.0sd | 101.1 | 51.6 | 3.6 | 40.5 | 47.3 | 44.1 | 59.8 | 47.5 |
| JK 7.0sd | 105.7 | 38.6 | 0.8 | 36.7 | 50.2 | 56.4 | 55.4 | 44.8 |
| JK 8.0sd | 90.3 | 87.6 | 20.3 | 85.1 | 75.4 | 92.1 | 58.3 | 67.8 |
| JK 9.0sd | 98.2 | 73.4 | 21.1 | 74.3 | 70.9 | 85.0 | 59.4 | 59.3 |
| JK 10.0sd | 104.0 | 60.7 | 22.4 | 68.2 | 63.8 | 78.3 | 57.4 | 55.8 |
| Single-subject procedure, relative-criterion method | ||||||||
| SS 10% | 61.4 | 68.8 | 35.1 | 57.6 | 34.2 | 62.7 | 72.8 | 59.0 |
| SS 30% | 90.6 | 42.0 | 3.3 | 27.1 | 42.2 | 41.0 | 61.0 | 32.9 |
| SS 50% | 91.7 | 29.0 | 0.3 | 13.6 | 48.3 | 35.1 | 48.7 | 19.7 |
| SS 70% | 95.9 | 21.3 | 0.1 | 11.6 | 55.4 | 27.6 | 38.1 | 18.6 |
| SS 90% | 97.8 | 16.7 | –0.7 | 12.4 | 68.1 | 23.1 | 23.7 | 16.7 |
| Jack-knife procedure, relative-criterion method | ||||||||
| JK 10% | 98.9 | 78.8 | –3.2 | 53.7 | 42.9 | 64.0 | 78.7 | 67.5 |
| JK 30% | 102.4 | 17.5 | –1.3 | 19.1 | 47.3 | 19.4 | 59.2 | 22.3 |
| JK 50% | 101.4 | 13.2 | –1.4 | 11.9 | 52.1 | 17.1 | 46.6 | 15.3 |
| JK 70% | 100.5 | 13.5 | –1.0 | 8.9 | 59.2 | 17.5 | 34.6 | 11.2 |
| JK 90% | 98.4 | 15.4 | –0.6 | 7.6 | 72.6 | 19.8 | 20.4 | 10.7 |
| Jack-knife procedure, fixed-criterion method | ||||||||
| JK 0.2μV | 100.1 | 49.1 | –3.5 | 49.7 | 40.9 | 51.9 | 79.8 | 62.4 |
| JK 0.4μV | 103.5 | 20.0 | –3.0 | 26.7 | 40.4 | 22.8 | 66.7 | 30.3 |
| JK 0.6μV | 103.3 | 18.7 | –3.2 | 18.9 | 42.1 | 21.5 | 55.2 | 22.0 |
| JK 0.8μV | 104.7 | 18.7 | –3.4 | 17.3 | 43.3 | 23.7 | 48.7 | 19.5 |
| JK 1.0μV | 100.4 | 18.7 | –3.8 | 16.5 | 47.8 | 24.5 | 40.8 | 17.6 |
| Single-subject procedure, regression-based method | ||||||||
| SS 1df | 92.8 | 32.3 | –0.9 | 27.7 | 25.9 | 33.3 | 68.6 | 31.0 |
| SS 2Rdf | 93.3 | 31.8 | –2.2 | 25.6 | 21.9 | 32.2 | 70.3 | 29.1 |
| SS 2Udf | 96.5 | 30.8 | –1.8 | 26.0 | 20.2 | 33.2 | 78.4 | 27.5 |
| SS 4df | 93.1 | 27.2 | 2.3 | 25.8 | 25.6 | 28.2 | 66.0 | 27.6 |
| Jack-knife procedure, regression-based method | ||||||||
| JK 1df | 104.0 | 29.1 | –3.6 | 28.6 | 29.7 | 29.3 | 86.8 | 33.2 |
| JK 2Rdf | 103.1 | 22.4 | 1.1 | 24.1 | 24.0 | 25.6 | 78.6 | 30.6 |
| JK 2Udf | 104.6 | 22.5 | –0.8 | 25.9 | 25.5 | 25.7 | 87.0 | 28.9 |
| JK 4df | 102.0 | 19.8 | 7.1 | 25.6 | 26.8 | 22.4 | 72.2 | 32.5 |
Note: SS = single-subject procedure; JK = jack-knife procedure; xsd = baseline-deviation method; x% = relative-criterion method; xμV = fixed-criterion method; and xdf = regression-based method.