Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 8;33(5):1315–1321. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0770-9

Table 1.

Gartland and Werley scoring system and the clinical assessment results of the ten patients

Item Score Patients’ score by number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Residual deformity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Ulnar styloid prominence 1
 Palmar deviation deformity 2
 Radial deviation deformity 3
Subjective evaluation of pain and disability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Absent 0
 Occasional pain and slightly limited motion 2 2 2
 Occasional pain and moderate limited motion 4 4
 Pain, limited motion, disabled 6
Objective evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Dorsal extension defect (<45°) 5
 Ulnar deviation defect (<15°) 3
 Supination defect (<50°) 2
 Palmar flexion defect (<30°) 1
 Radial deviation defect (<15°) 1
 Circular motion defect 1
 Lower radioulnar pain 1 1
 Grip: 60% of opposite side or less 1
 Rotation defect 2
Complications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Inflammatory change in joint 1–5 1
 Median nerve complications 1
 Poor digital function due to plaster use 2
Total score 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 5

Excellent: 0–2; good:3–8; fair: 9–20; poor: >21