Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 22;33(1):215–218. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0481-z

Table 1.

Second percutaneous radiofrequency thermoablation (PRT) of the recurred five patients

Case Sex Age Site and size(mm) PP* RFP† (month) FFS‡ (month) Results
1 F 18 Femur (7×6×4) Open excision 1 57 Good
2 M 21 Femur (4×4×2) Thermoablation 4 43 Good
3 M 26 Femur (4×5×4) Thermoablation 16 54 Good
4 M 31 Ilium (14×13×3) Thermoablation 2 66 Good
5 M 17 Femur (6×8×4) Thermoablation 8 24 Good

*Primary procedure

†Recurrence period from primary procedure

‡Follow-up from second procedure