Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 28;33(1):203–209. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0441-7

Table 1.

Patient demographic data

Patient number Age (yrs)/gendera Siteb Diagnosis Grade/stage Procedure Duration of follow-up (months) Range of motion: involved/uninvolved (%) Grip strength: involved/uninvolved (%) Functional analysisd Remarks
1 21/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 42.3 67% 64% Excellent Revised plate and bone grafting
2 56/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 90.9 73% 70% Good -
3 61/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 50.4 NAc NA Good -
4 41/M R Giant cell tumour, recurrent 3 Osteoarticular allograft 54.0 Fusion Fusion Good Ulnar translocation radiocarpal
5 43/M R Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 41.5 72% 77% Excellent -
6 36/M L Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 42.0 65% 58% Excellent Revised plate and bone grafting
7 39/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Osteoarticular allograft 48.2 78% 80% Excellent -
8 25/M R Giant cell tumour, recurrent 3 Osteoarticular allograft 52.2 80% 84% Excellent -
9 21/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Fibular autograft 94.4 64% 48% Excellent -
10 34/M R Giant cell tumour 3 Fibular autograft 95.5 NA NA Good -
11 27/M L Giant cell tumour 3 Fibular autograft 57.2 78% 76% Excellent -
12 18/F R Giant cell tumour 3 Fibular autograft 71.8 73% 58% Excellent -
13 24/M R Malignant fibrous histiocyxoma IIB Fibular autograft 57.9 77% 82% Excellent -
14 27/F L Simple bone cyst 3 Fibular autograft 50.6 70% 64% Excellent -
15 43/M R Well-differentiated osteosarcoma IB Fibular autograft 58.8 80% 86% Excellent -

aF female; M male

bR right; L left

cNA data not applicable

dMusculoskeletal Tumour Society functional classification