Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 1;33(1):19–26. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0443-5

Table 1.

Numerical data and descriptive characteristics

Reference Study duration Study type Mean age (years) M/F ratio F up rate Mean time of follow-up (mo) Number of followed frx Proportion of comminuted frx (pcom) Proportion of severe open frx (pse) Prophylactic use of antibiotics Soft tissue reconstruction Bone graft rate Quality
Ruedi T, 1976[27] 1966–72 R nd nd 94%  >12 95 nd 0.60 50% of cases nd nd 4
Jensen JS, 1977[15] 1966–75 R 34 3.4 96% 40.8 27 0.36 0.41 Y nd nd 4
Kristensen K, 1979 [18] 1968–76 R nd nd 82% 12 23 0.70 0.30 Y nd 8.7% 5
Langenberg, 1987 [19] 1975–86 R 37 1.8 100% Nd 21 0.22 0.75 nd nd nd 5
Clifford, 1988[5] 4-year period R 29.2 5.8 88%  >12 97 0.75 0.62 nd Del. flap: 3 SSG: 30 del. clos.: 2 prim clos.: 27 gran.: 35 nd 5
Vara-Thorbeck R, 1989 [31] 1971–87 R nd 2.2 100%  >12 50 0.52 0.35 Y nd nd 6
Bach, 1989 [2] 16-month period P rand 37 2.1 95%  >12 26 nd 1.00 Y Delayed closure/flap 42.3% 7
Korovessis, 1992 [17] 1984–86 R 35 10.5 97%  >12 44 0.59 0.14 Y 86.4% 6
Bilat, 1994 [3] 1980–84 R 36 1.8 96% 79.0 42 0.63 0.71 Y nd nd 6
Singh, 1997 [30] 1989–90 R 35.2 5.7 99%  >12 37 0.54 0.41 Y nd nd 7
Gopal, 2000 [12] 1990–98 R 37 5.15 100%  >12 30 0.80 1.00 Y Immed flap: 10 early flap: 13 del. flap: 7 36.7% 7

clos closure, del.: delayed, frx : fractures, gran.: granulation, immed.: immediate, M/F: male/female, nd: not documented, prim.: primary, P: prospective, R: retrospective, rand: randomized, SSG: split skin graft, Y: yes