Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 17;34(1):71–77. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0733-1

Table 4.

Comparison of the functional results after implantation of a reversed total shoulder arthroplasty performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff

Variable Woodruff et al. [24] Rittmeister and Kerschbaumer [15] This study by John et al.
Number of joints included 13 8 17
Patient’s mean age (y) 64 60.25 67.3
Follow-up time (mo) 87 54 24.3
Number (cases) and species of complication Radiolucent lines around all (cementless) stems (100%) and around the metaglene in 5 cases (38.5%) One septic implant loosening (12.5%); two aseptic glenoid loosening (25.0%); three failed osteosynthesis following transacromial approach (37.5%) Scapular notching grade I + II in 4 cases (23.5%)
Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op Pre-op Post-op
SF-36a / SF-12b MCS 49.36b 53.9a
PCS 33.4b 30.0a
Constant score 59.0 17 63.0 19 59.5

Pre-op preoperative, post-op postoperative, SF-36 short form-36, SF-12 short form-12, PCS physical component summary of SF-36/ SF-12, MCS mental component summary of SF-36/ SF-12

a Related to the SF-36

b Related to the SF-12