Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 6;18(2):218–231. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z

Table 9.

Summary of the results of ACDF compared with Bryan disc using clinical and radiologic parameters

Parameters Single level ACDF and Bryan Double level ACDF and Bryan
VAS score p = 0.8371 p = 0.2938
NDI score p = 0.2872 p = 0.6753
ROM (implanted level) p < 0.0001* p < 0.0001*
ROM (upper adjacent level) p = 0.2872 p < 0.0001*
ROM (lower adjacent level) p < 0.005* p < 0.0001*
FSU alignment p < 0.0001* p = 0.0280*
Overall C2–C7 alignment p < 0.0001* p < 0.0001*
Disc height(Implanted –AIH) p < 0.0001* p < 0.0001*
Disc height(Implanted –PIH) p = 0.0052* p < 0.0001*
Disc height(upper–AIH) p = 0.1264 p = 0.0172*
Disc height(upper–PIH) p < 0.0001* p = 0.8363
Disc height(lower–AIH) p = 0.7598 p < 0.0001*
Disc height(lower–PIH) p < 0.0001* p < 0.0001*

p = 0.05 set value for statistical significance using the mixed model

* Statistically significant

AIH Anterior interbody height, PIH posterior interbody height, ACDF anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, FSU functional spinal unit, VAS visual analogue scale, NDI neck disability index