Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 18;18(2):244–253. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0813-8

Table 1.

Iliac crest, lumbar spine and femoral cancellous bone structural histomorphometry (mean ± SEM) at different time points for the control and the treated sheep

Baseline Control Treated
0 month (n = 2) 6 month (n = 2) 3 month (n = 5) 6 month (n = 5)
Iliac crest
 BV/TV (%) 18.1 ± 0.7 17.9 ± 1.6 15.4 ± 0.9 13.1 ± 1.2‡,*
 Tb.Th (mm) 0.11 ± 0.0 0.12 ± 0.0 0.09 ± 0.0 0.08 ± 0.0‡,*
 Tb.Sp (mm) 0.50 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.1 0.49 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.02
Tb.N (#/mm) 1.60 ± 0.07 1.50 ± 0.2 1.72 ± 0.06 1.60 ± 0.2
Lumbar spine
 BV/TV (%) 28.1 ± 1.7 33.9 ± 1.9 21.9 ± 0.7 19.9 ± 0.7‡,*
 Tb.Th (mm) 0.15 ± 0.0 0.16 ± 4.6 0.11 ± 0.00 0.10 ± 0.00‡,*
 Tb.Sp (mm) 0.5 ± 0.03 0.32 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.02
 Tb.N (#/mm) 1.6 ± 0.07 2.13 ± 0.2 1.97 ± 0.07 2.03 ± 0.1
Proximal femur
 BV/TV (%) 26.5 ± 4.8 31.7 ± 2.1 14.7 ± 0.8 15.2 ± 1.7†,**
 Tb.Th (mm) 0.17 ± 0.05 0.15 ± 0.0 0.12 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.00
Tb.Sp (mm) 0.47 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.05 0.71 ± 0.08‡,*
Tb.N (#/mm) 1.57 ± 0.2 2.08 ± 0.04 1.23 ± 0.07 1.25 ± 0.1†,**

Testing the significant differences of the histomorphometry data from the 6-month treated with the baseline (†  < 0.05, ‡ P < 0.01) and 6-month control sheep (*  < 0.05, **  < 0.01)