Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 17;2:8. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00008

Table 1.

Simple theoretical framework for estimating CMRO2 from multimodal measurements.

Theoretical Framework
VARIABLES
f = CBF normalized to baseline
r = CMRO2 normalized to baseline
s = BOLD signal normalized to baseline
E = O2 extraction fraction
pC = mean blood pO2 (mmHg)
pT = mean tissue pO2 (mmHg)
REQUIRED BASELINE PARAMETERS (TYPICAL VALUES)
E0 = 0.4
pT0 = 25 mmHg
MODEL PARAMETERS
α = 0.4 (blood volume effects)
β = 1.5 (intravascular signal changes, diffusion)
M = local scaling factor, determined by calibration
p50 = 26 mmHg (O2-hemoglobin 50% saturation)
h = 2.8 (Hill exponent)
MODEL EQUATIONS
(1) Mass balance:
r=EE0f
(2) BOLD signal (Davis et al., 1998):
s=M[1fα(EE0)β]
(3) Blood/tissue O2 gradient:
r=pCpTpC0pT0
(4) Mean blood pO2 (Gjedde, 2005a,b):
pC=p50[2E1]1/h

The equations describe: (1) Mass balance for O2, expressed in terms of variables normalized to their baseline values; (2) Davis model for the BOLD signal, with the parameter α describing effects of blood volume changes, and β approximating differential diffusion effects around large and small vessels estimated from Monte Carlo simulations; (3) Assumption that the tissue/blood pO2 gradient increases to match a change in CMRO2, and that this gradient is determined solely by the difference of the mean O2 concentrations in blood and tissue (no capillary recruitment); and (4) Expression for mean blood pO2 assuming the Hill equation for the O2-hemoglobin saturation curve, with exponent h and half-saturation at a pO2 of p50, and assuming that the pO2 corresponding to half of the total extracted O2 is the mean value for blood.