Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 11;18(9):1379–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1051-4

Table 1.

Nine patients undergoing posterior occipitocervical fusion with template-guided placement of C2 laminar screws

Cases Sex Ages (years) Diagnosis Operative procedure Follow-up (myelopathic symptoms) Placement accuracy (postoperative CT)
1 F 42 BI (OA, C2–3) C0–2 Improved No bony breach
2 F 38 BI (OA) C0–2 No change No bony breach
3 M 17 BI (OA, C2–3) C0–2a Improved No bony breach
4 F 29 BI (OA) C0–2 Improved No bony breach
5 M 43 BI (OA) C0–2 Improved No bony breach
6 M 35 BI (C2–3) C0–2 Improved No bony breach
7 F 53 BI (OA, C2–3) C0–2 No change No bony breach
8 F 34 BI (OA, C2–3) C0–2 Improved No bony breach
9 M 27 BI (OA, C2–3) C0–2 Improved No bony breach

BI basilar invagination, C0–2 posterior occipital-C2 fixation, OA occipitalization of the atlas, C2–3 C2–3 vertebral fusion

aUnilateral laminar screw fixation and other side of pedicle screw fixation