Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 15;19(2):181–204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1155-x

Table 3.

Criteria list for quality assessment of non-controlled studies

A Patient selection/inclusion adequately described? Y N ?
B Drop out rate described? Y N ?
C Independent assessor? Y N ?
D Co-interventions described? Y N ?
E Was the timing of the outcome assessment similar? Y N ?

? score unclear

A: All the basic elements of the study population are adequately described; i.e. demography, type and level of disorder, physical and radiological inclusion and exclusion criteria, pre-operative treatment and duration of disorder

B: Are the patients of whom no outcome was obtained, described in quantity and reason for drop out

C: The data were assessed by an independent assessor

D: All co-interventions in the population during and after the operation are described

E: The timing of outcome assessment should be more or less identical for all intervention groups and for all important outcome assessments