. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Mar 30;31(4):323–335. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.011

Table 3.

Primary Questions Addressed by the FAN Process Evaluation

Area Addressed	Question
Dose delivered or completeness	To what extent were FAN training components and follow up technical assistance provided to the FAN committee members, cooks, and pastors?
Dose received	To what extent did training and follow up activities prepare FAN committee members, cooks, and pastors to carry out FAN (knowledge, confidence, and skills)?
Dose received	To what extent were AME members exposed to planned messages?
Reach: Training participants	To what extent did designated FAN committee members, cooks, and pastors attend training?
Fidelity-implementation	To what extent did the FAN committee members, cooks, and pastors carry out planned activities based on “health-promoting church” guidelines?
Fidelity-organizational change	To what extent was the church organization and environment consistent with “health-promoting church” policies and practices?
Context	What activities within the church could affect FAN implementation or outcomes?
Recruitment	What approaches to recruitment were used? What approaches to recruitment were effective or ineffective?