Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 24;19(5):768–773. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1256-6

Table 1.

Vertebral shape significant differences between females (N = 120) and males (N = 120) (20 ≤ age ≤ 80)

Vertebra T9 T10 T11 T12 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Vertebral body (VB) sagittal wedging (degrees)*
 Females 2.8 ± 0.04 2.6 ± 0.04 4.6 ± 0.05 3.5 ± 0.04 2.6 ± 0.05 0.7 ± 0.03 −1.1 ± 0.04 −3.1 ± 0.04 −7.8 ± 0.05
 Males 4.8 ± 0.04 3.8 ± 0.05 5.4 ± 0.05 4.9 ± 0.04 4.1 ± 0.04 2.6 ± 0.04 1.3 ± 0.05 −0.7 ± 0.04 −4.6 ± 0.05
Ratio: spinous process thickness/VB sagittal height
 Females 0.47 ± 0.05 0.52 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.04 0.79 ± 0.04 0.67 ± 0.05 0.57 ± 0.06
 Males 0.50 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.04 0.55 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.05 0.87 ± 0.10 0.92 ± 0.09 0.91 ± 0.09 0.80 ± 0.07 0.67 ± 0.07
Ratio: interfacet width/VB width
 Females 0.80 ± 0.02 0.80 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.02 0.75 ± 0.04 0.73 ± 0.05 0.70 ± 0.06 0.7 ± 0.05 0.73 ± 0.06 0.77 ± 0.09
 Males 0.74 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.01 0.71 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.04 0.63 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.08

Negative values dorsal wedging, positive values ventral wedging, Bold significantly different from males (Bonferoni P < 0.03); ± SD (standard deviation), VB vertebral body