Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 5;19(5):774–781. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1340-y

Table 2.

The inter-method difference, shown in the lower left part of the table as the mean absolute differences and coefficients of variations (MAD [CV]), and the inter-method reliability, shown in the upper right part of the table as the mean differences ±1.96 × standard deviation (95% confidence intervals)

Method Aaro and Dahlborn Ho et al. Krismer et al. Göçen et al. Computerized (2D) Computerized (3D)
Aaro and Dahlborn · –1.0° ± 3.6°  1.3° ± 2.9° –0.9° ± 2.6° –0.2° ± 2.6° –0.3° ± 2.5°
Ho et al. 1.7° [1.08] · 2.3° ± 5.4° 0.1° ± 3.0° 0.8° ± 3.3° 0.7° ± 3.0°
Krismer et al. 1.6° [0.92] 2.9° [0.95] · –2.2° ± 3.1° –1.5° ± 3.9° –1.6° ± 3.9°
Göçen et al. 1.2° [1.11] 1.1° [1.39] 2.5° [0.63] · 0.7° ± 3.1° 0.6° ± 3.0°
Computerized (2D) 1.0° [1.33] 1.5° [1.12] 1.9° [1.05] 1.3° [1.22] · –0.1° ± 1.4°
Computerized (3D) 1.0° [1.28] 1.3° [1.18] 1.9° [1.05] 1.2° [1.28] 0.6° [1.19] ·