Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 4;19(6):957–962. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1289-x

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants at enrollment and 6-week follow-up (N = 46)

Characteristic Enrollment 6-week follow-up
Female [n (%)] 33 (71.7)
Age (years)
 Mean (SD); range 43.2 (13.7); 19.6–73.5
Time since injury (days)
 Mean (SD); range 5.7 (4.7); 0–19
WAD grade
 I [n (%)] 14 (30.4)
 II [n (%)] 32 (69.6)
Highest level of education [n (%)]
 High school or less 8 (17.4)
 Post-secondary or some university 12 (26.1)
 Technical school graduate 8 (17.4)
 University graduate 18 (39.1)
Income [n (%)]
 $0–$49,999 24 (52.2)
 $50,000–$59,999 8 (17.4)
 $60,000–$79,999 4 (8.7)
 $80,000+ 8 (17.4)
 Did not respond 2 (4.4)
Lawyer involvement in the claim (%) 0 3 (8.7)b
Pain intensity, Mean (SD)a
 Neck 5.6 (2.1) 2.9 (2.7)
 Shoulder 3.9 (3.0) 2.5 (2.9)
 Low back 3.4 (3.2) 2.5 (3.1)
 Headache 3.3 (3.2) 1.8 (2.5)
 Arm 2.1 (2.7) 1.7 (2.7)
WDQ score, Mean (SD) 47.5 (29.5) 31.2 (29.8)
General recovery question [n (%)]
 Completely better 8 (17.4)
 Much improved 20 (43.5)
 Slightly improved 13 (28.3)
 No change 3 (6.5)
 Slightly worse 0
 Much worse 1 (2.2)
 Worse than ever 1 (2.2)
Change in neck pain question [n (%)]
 Very much better 16 (34.8)
 Better 14 (30.4)
 Slightly better 13 (28.3)
 No change 2 (4.3)
 Slightly worse 1 (2.2)
 Worse 0
 Very much worse 0

SD standard deviation

aNumeric rating scale of 0–10 (0 no pain and 10 worst pain ever)

bOne participant refused to answer the question; therefore, the denominator for the proportion is 45