Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 26;19(7):1104–1114. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1326-9

Table 5.

Comparison of pattern similarity of each dimension per spinal region

Cervical High thoracic Low thoracic Lumbar
VBHa C C C C
VBhc C C NC C
VBHp C C C NC
UEPW C C NC C
UEPD NC NC C C
LEPW NC C NC C
LEPD C NC C C
IDH NC NC NC NC
SCW C C NC C
SCD NC NC NC CN
TPL NC C C NC
SPL NC NC C CN
SPA NC NC NC NC
PedW NC C C NC
PedH C NC C NC
PedA NC C NC NC
SCW/UEPW NC C C C
SCD/UEPD NC NC C NC
IDH/UEPW NC NC NC NC
SPL/UEPD NC NC C CN
TPL/UEPW C C NC NC
PedW/UEPW NC C C NC
PedH/VBH C C NC C

The ratio between human and porcine values of a dimension was calculated for each vertebra. If the variance of these ratios was less than 20% between the vertebrae of that specific region, the pattern for that particular dimension was defined as ‘comparable’. Abbreviations of the anatomical dimensions are explained in Table 1

C comparable, NC not comparable