Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 May 23;68(1):61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.035

Table 2.

Region pairs showing significant difference in functional connectivity (measured by resting correlations). Anatomical connectivity is lower in patients and negatively correlated with positive PANSS subscores for all region pairs. The anatomical position of those connections is presented on figure 1.

ROI 1 ROI 2 Functional
Correlation
Group
Difference
(t-value)
Functional
Connectivit
y PANSS
correlation
(r-value)
Functional
Connectivit
y TDI
correlation
(r-value)
Anatomical
Connectivit
y Group
difference
(t-value)
Anatomical
Connectivit
y PANSS
correlation
(r-value)
Anatomical
Connectivit
y TDI
correlation
(r-value)
Ant.Cing.
(Ventral)
IFG Left *2.96 *0.46 0.18 **4.0 −0.28 −0.16
 Medial
Frontal
Gyrus
(Ventral)
IFG Left *2.65 **0.48 0.25 **−3.9 −0.29 −0.18
 Thalamus Postcentral
Left
*2.75 *0.45 *0.44 **−3.9 −0.29 −0.06
 Medial
Temporal
Gyrus Left
Postcentral
Left
*−3.0 **−0.48 −0.26 **−3.64 **−0.49 −0.07
*

denotes p<0.02,

**

p<0.01.