TABLE 2.
Sexual Potency Rates in Contemporary Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Retropubic Prostatectomy Series
Approach | Patients (n) | Follow Up (Months) | Mean Patient Age (Years) | Potency (%) | Definition | Nerve Sparing | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP | 5,824 | 12 | 64 | 53 | N/A | Bilateral | Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, et al76 |
LRP | 200 | 12 | 62 | 71 | Erections | N/A | Eden CG, King D, Kooiman GG, et al72 |
LRP | 177 | 12 | N/A | 76 | Intercourse | Bilateral | Su LM, Link RE, Bhayani SB, et al80 |
LRP | 26 | 12 | 63 | 65 | N/A | Bilateral | Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, et al8 |
RRP | 33 | 12 | 64 | 55 | N/A | Bilateral | Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, et al8 |
LRP | 143 | 12 | 64 | 88 | Erections | Bilateral | Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al74 |
RRP | 64 | 18 | 57 | 86 | Intercourse | Bilateral | Walsh PC61 |
RRP | 1,291 | 18 | 63 | 44 | Intercourse | Bilateral | Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al78 |
Abbreviations: LRP, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; RRP, radical retropubic prostatectomy; N/A, not available.