Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Jun;63(6):1510–1519. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22337

Table 1.

(a) Results from computerized axon identification (Algorithm) vs. manual axon identification (Human Expert 1 and 2) in white and gray matter regions, and (b) comparison between computerized axon identification (Algorithm) vs. manual axon identification (Human Expert 1) in regions of the posterior funiculus in Slices 1 and 2, and the anterior funiculus in Slices 1 and 4. The locations of the regions on the axon density maps are shown in Fig. 3.

(a) Axon Identification: Algorithm vs. Two Human Experts for One Slice
Axon Count
Algorithm Human Expert 1 Human Expert 2
Total Total (% thereof selected by algorithm)
White Matter (0.215 mm2 aggregate area)
Slice 2 3739 3470 (91%) 3503 (95%)
Gray Matter (0.215 mm2 aggregate area)
Slice 2 1662 464 (84%) 515 (86%)
(b) Axon Identification: Algorithm vs. one Human Expert for Multiple Slices
Axon Count
Algorithm Human Expert 1 -
Total Total (% thereof selected by algorithm)
Posterior Funiculus (0.88 mm2)
Slice 1 13,909 13,801 (84%) -
Slice 2 14,191 13,416 (93%) -
Anterior Funiculus (0.10 mm2 aggregate area)
Slice 1 1,811 1,514 (78%) -
Slice 4 2,610 2,466 (81%) -