Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 17;20(8):1853–1864. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp249

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Effects of grammatical structure and reversibility on subsequent picture matching. (A) Responses to picture-matching events following reversible object-embedded versus reversible subject-embedded sentences. Axial slices for panels (A,B) are z = 6, 16, 26, 36, and 46. (B) Responses to picture-matching events following reversible subject-embedded versus irreversible subject-embedded sentences. (C) Time course of response to “auditory sentence events” in LIFG (Talairach −48, +13, +4). (D) Response to “visual picture-matching events” in the same area, LIFG. (E) Time course following sentences in the right hemisphere homolog of Broca's area (Talairach +48, +13, +4). No auditory response is apparent. (F) Response to pictures in the same area, RIFG.