Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Mol Bioeng. 2009 Dec;2(4):554–572. doi: 10.1007/s12195-009-0087-1

Table 3. Effect estimates for alignment from the result of Design Expert analysis.

Coded coefficients are transformed so the high value of the factor becomes +1 and the low value becomes −1 (i.e. for A, 50μm becomes +1 and 10 μm becomes −1).

Factor Coefficient (Actual Factor) Coefficient (Coded Factor) Standard Error (Coded) Percent Contribution P-value
A7 Model <0.0001*
Intercept 0.643 0.440 0.009
A-space width 2.09 × 10−3 −0.031 0.012 14.9% 0.0109*
B-stripe width −2.85 × 10−3 −0.057 0.012 47.7% <0.0001*
C-plating density −6.56 × 10−6 −0.015 0.01 4.5% 0.1621
D-culture time −1.16 × 10−3 0.012 0.009 4.2% 0.1728
AD −1.01 × 10−4 −0.024 0.012 9.0% 0.0468*
CD 1.57 × 10−7 0.03 0.01 19.6% 0.0037*
Lack of fit 0.9172**

HUVEC Model <0.0001*
Intercept 0.338 0.290 0.006
A-space width −1.34 × 10−3 −0.027 0.009 32.6% 0.0032*
B-stripe width 1.64 × 10−3 −0.033 0.009 47.3% 0.0005*
C-plating density 1.13 × 10−6 0.018 0.008 20.1% 0.019*
Lack of fit 0.7534**

SC Model <0.0001*
Intercept 0.633 0.710 0.005
A-space width 3.42 × 10−3 −0.013 0.006 11.2% 0.0432*
C-plating density 1.34 × 10−6 0.022 0.006 42.7% <0.0002*
D-culture time 8.22 × 10−4 −0.015 0.005 28.1% 0.0019*
AD −6.81 × 10−5 −0.016 0.007 18.0% 0.0140*
Lack of fit 0.5838**
*

indicates the factor as a significant contributor to the model with p<0.05,

**

indicates an insignificant lack of fit with p>0.05