Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Mol Bioeng. 2009 Dec;2(4):554–572. doi: 10.1007/s12195-009-0087-1

Table 4. Effect estimates for terminal density from the result of Design Expert analysis.

Coded coefficients are transformed so the high value of the factor becomes +1 and the low value becomes −1 (i.e. for A, 50μm becomes +1 and 10 μm becomes −1).

Factor Coefficient (Actual Factor) Coefficient (Coded Factor) Standard Error (Coded) Percent Contribution P-value
A7 Model <0.0001*
Intercept −41900 49700 1430
B-stripe width 538 6880 2060 4.7% 0.0011*
C-plating density 0.698 20200 1680 61.1% <0.0001*
D-culture time 1620 11200 1380 28.3% <0.0001*
BC 0.0189 6030 2380 2.7% 0.0127*
BD −22.7 −5450 1980 3.2% 0.0068*
Lack of fit 0.1557**

HUVEC Model <0.0001*
Intercept −1960 28000 811
C-plating density 0.445 7120 951 57.7 <0.0001*
D-culture time 424 5090 795 42.3 <0.0001*
Lack of fit 0.9799**

SC Model <0.0001*
Intercept 1330 53300 1030
A-space width 248 −5930 1480 6.4% 0.0001*
B-stripe width −666 7580 1490 10.3% <0.0001*
C-plating density 1.43 15000 1230 59.3% <0.0001*
D-culture time 38.7 6730 1020 17.3% <0.0001*
AC −0.0165 −5280 1790 3.5% 0.004*
BD 17.4 4180 1480 3.2% 0.0057*
Lack of fit 0.1925**
*

indicates the factor as a significant contributor to the model with p<0.05,

**

indicates an insignificant lack of fit with p>0.05