Table 5.
Association of cancer prevention clinical trial barrier subscales and demographic factors to interest in first-degree relatives in participation in a cancer prevention clinical trial (n=60 complete data)a
Variable | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval |
---|---|---|
Information sources scale | 3.36b | (1.04,10.84) |
Preferences for prevention approaches scale | 0.97c | (0.38,2.48) |
Psychosocial factors scale | 2.47d | (1.15,5.31) |
Confounders | ||
Sex (Female) | 0.94 | (0.25,3.61) |
Age | 1.12 | (0.90,1.39) |
Education (Some college) | 0.96 | (0.29,3.17) |
Married/partnered | 2.55 | (0.63,10.36) |
Number of relatives with cancer | 1.27 | (0.54,3.00) |
How often FDR is involved with care of patient | 0.92 | (0.59,1.44) |
Employed/seeking employment | 0.20 | (0.01,3.29) |
Cumulative logistic regression slope estimates for 3-level ordinal variable: “I would participate in a cancer prevention clinical trial if it was offered to me.”
Odds ratio for individuals who are more information source responsive versus less
Odds ratio for individuals who are less averse to treatments versus more
Odds ratio for individuals who report fewer psychosocial barriers versus more