Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2010 May 25;21(7):984–991. doi: 10.1177/0956797610372634

Table 1.

Multilevel autocorrelation analyses for each emotion, predicted by level of self-esteem

Emotion Level 1
Level 2 (self-esteem)
B SE p B SE p
Happy Intercept 58.58 1.48 .000 7.45 2.52 .005
Slope 0.30 0.02 .000 −0.07 0.03 .032
Excited Intercept 55.53 1.58 .000 8.54 2.52 .001
Slope 0.33 0.02 .000 −0.08 0.03 .025
Relaxed Intercept 61.53 1.42 .000 8.12 2.43 .002
Slope 0.27 0.02 .000 −0.04 0.04 .304
Satisfied Intercept 59.96 1.30 .000 9.29 2.38 .000
Slope 0.29 0.02 .000 −0.06 0.04 .123
Angry Intercept 6.63 0.70 .000 −2.57 1.46 .082
Slope 0.20 0.03 .000 −.09 0.05 .051
Anxious Intercept 7.38 1.11 .000 −8.84 2.80 .003
Slope 0.22 0.02 .000 −0.14 0.04 .002
Depressed Intercept 6.70 0.75 .000 −7.11 1.79 .000
Slope 0.22 0.03 .000 −0.11 0.05 .025
Sad Intercept 8.58 0.87 .000 −5.20 1.80 .005
Slope 0.27 0.03 .000 −0.06 0.05 .297

Note. In each analysis, the lagged predictor was group-mean centered at Level 1. To remove previous day effects, the first measurement of each day for the lagged variables was replaced with a missing value. At Level 1, the intercept reflects the average emotion rating and the slope reflects the average autocorrelation/inertia. At Level 2, self-esteem was grand centered. Here, the intercept reflects the association between self-esteem and the average emotion level across participants, and the slope reflects the association between self-esteem and the autocorrelation/inertia across participants.