Table 3. Comparison of characteristics and their effect on hand-hygiene compliance, by multivariate analysisa.
| Variable | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | p value |
|---|---|---|
| Glove use |
3.5 (2.4 to 5.1) |
0.003 |
| Invasive procedure performed |
2.7 (1.4 to 5.1) |
0.003 |
| Hand hygiene performed on room entry |
2.4 (1.2 to 4.5) |
0.01 |
| Patient contact |
2.1 (1.4 to 3.1) |
<0.001 |
| Health-care workers with a higher ranking health-care worker or peer who did not wash hands |
0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) |
<0.001 |
| Hospital unitsb |
|
|
| Old hospital, non-ICU |
1.0 |
-- |
| Old hospital, ICU |
1.0 (0.6 to 1.8) |
0.89 |
| New hospital, non-ICU |
0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) |
0.002 |
| New hospital, ICU | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) | <0.001 |
aHospital units grouped as intensive-care unit (ICU) or non-ICU units and by old or new hospital. All variables displayed in the table were included in the final model.
bAll hospital unit groups were compared to the two non-ICUs in the old hospital, i.e., the referent group, which had the lowest sink-to-bed ratios (1:6 and 1:11). All other units had a sink-to-bed ratio of 1:1.