. 2010 Jun 6;2010:728453. doi: 10.1155/2010/728453

Table 3.

Mean scores of microleakage for RMGIC restorations using a polyacrylic acid conditioning or three different self-etching adhesive systems.

	Mean scores of microleakage (±SD)				P
	DC + FII		SE + FII		P
GROUP I	DC-1 + FII-1	1.49 (±0.94)	XIII + FII	0.81 (±0.76)*	<.0001
GROUP I	(n = 10)	1.49 (±0.94)	(n = 10)	0.81 (±0.76)*	<.0001
GROUP II	DC-2 + FII-2	0.64 (±0.68)	iB exp + FII	0.81 (±0.93)*	.43
GROUP II	(n = 10)	0.64 (±0.68)	(n = 10)	0.81 (±0.93)*	.43
GROUP III	DC-3 + FII-3	0.61 (±0.70)	APLP + FII	0.69 (±0.63)*	.33
GROUP III	(n = 10)	0.61 (±0.70)	(n = 10)	0.69 (±0.63)*	.33

Total	All DC + FII	0.91 (±0.88)	All SE + FII	0.77 (±0.78)	.091
Total	(n = 30)	0.91 (±0.88)	(n = 30)	0.77 (±0.78)	.091

*When the different adhesive systems are compared, there is no statistically significant difference between the 3 one-step SE adhesives tested in this study (P = .73).