Table III.
Prediction of MPH Response on the CTRS–ADHD Index for MD Week versus Placebo-Univariate Logistic Regression
| Predictor | na | β | SE | OR | 95% CI | pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTRS—Hyperactivity (T)c | 87 | .044 | .019 | 1.045 | 1.007–1.085 | .019* |
| CTRS—ADHD Index (T) | 87 | .042 | .020 | 1.043 | 1.003–1.085 | .036* |
| SSRS—Problem Behavior (SS)d | 106 | .031 | .016 | 1.032 | 1.001–1.064 | .045* |
| CBCL—Thought Problems (SS) | 49 | .108 | .051 | 1.114 | 1.009–1.230 | .033* |
| CBCL—Attention Problems (SS) | 49 | .075 | .036 | 1.078 | 1.004–1.157 | .038* |
Notes. CTRS, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale; SSRS, Social Skills Rating System; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist.
aCTRS (n = 87) due to failure of teachers to return forms; CBCL (n = 49) as was implemented half-way through study.
bOnly significant predictors (p < .05) are presented here. All variables from Tables I and II, in addition to individual scales from the CBCL were evaluated.
cT Score; mean = 50, SD = 10.
dSS, Standard Score; mean = 100, SD = 15.
*p < .05.