. 2009 Jun 26;35(2):167–176. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp054

Table III.

Longitudinal Analyses: Family Variables Predicting Adherence

Independent variables	Dependent variables	T1→T2		T2→T3
		β	R²Δ	β	R²Δ
1. Conflict medical questionnaire (M–F–C)	M–F catheterization	0.119	.014	−.337	.113^*
	T–HP catheterization			−.305	.091^*
	M–F general	.293	.083	−.403	.168^*
	T–HP general			−.032	.001
2. Conflict nonmedical questionnaire (M–F–C)	M–F catheterization	.023	.001	−.111	.012
	T–HP catheterization			−.016	.000
	M–F general	.113	.011	−.252	.059
	T–HP general			.110	.012
3. Family cohesion questionnaire (M–F)	M–F catheterization	−.042	.002	−.085	.007
	T–HP catheterization			−.163	.026
	M–F general	.126	.016	−.148	.019
	T–HP general			−.177	.030
4. Family conflict observational	M–F catheterization	−.012	.000	−.064	.004
	T–HP catheterization			.054	.003
	M–F general	−.100	.009	−.267	.060
	T–HP general			−.180	.029
5. Family cohesion observational	M–F catheterization	−.096	.009	.116	.013
	T–HP catheterization			.051	.002
	M–F general	−.184	.034	.008	.000
	T–HP general			.124	.014

Note. Time 2 Teacher reports were dropped due to low alphas. M–F–C, mother, father, child report composite; M–F, mother and father report composite; T–HP, teacher and health professional report composite.

*p < .05.