Table 2.
Treatment and outcome
| Fracture type | Treatment method | Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Good | Poor | ||
| A (N = 1) | Conservative | 1 | - | - |
| B1 (N = 7) | DCP (3) | 1 | 1 | 1 non-union |
| Long stem revision (4) | 2 | - | 1 dislocation, 1 infected nonunion | |
| B2 (N = 42) | Long stem revision alone (19) | 14 | 5 | - |
| Long stem revision with DCP (8) | 5 | 3 | - | |
| Distal locking long stem revision (15) | 6 | 3 | 2 dislocation, 3 stem subsidence, 1 nonunion | |
| B3 (N = 17) | Distal locking long stem revision (8) | 3 | 2 | 3 stem subsidence |
| Long stem revision alone (9) | 4 | 2 | 3 infection | |
| C (N = 5) | ORIF (4) | 3 | 1 | - |
| Distal locking long stem revision (1) | - | 1 | - | |
| Total | 39 (54%) | 18 (25%) | 15 (21%) | |
DCP dynamic compression plate, ORIF open reduction internal fixation