Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jun 30;132(25):8635–8644. doi: 10.1021/ja100366c

Table 2.

EPR and Mössbauer parameters of observed FeIII complexes

EPR Mössbauer

D (cm−1) E/D Conc (mM)a %Fe b δ(mm/s) ΔEQ (mm/s) η A0/gnβn (T) %Feb
1 + CHD D1 (S = 5/2) −1.5 0.18 1.08 54 0.36 −1.56 1.7 −19.5 58
D2 (S = 5/2) −1.5 0.24 0.56 28 0.36 −1.56 1.7 −20.1 28
D3 (S = 3/2) −6 0.22 0.16 8 -
Self- Decay of 1 D1 (S = 5/2) −1.5 0.18 0.47 23 0.36 −1.56 1.7 −19.7 38c
D2 (S = 5/2) −1.5 0.24 0.20 10
D3 (S = 3/2) −6 0.22 0.10 5
C (S = 5/2) −2.3 0.15 1.00 50 0.34 −2.00d 1 −18.8 48c
a

As a result of the complexity of the model used in the fitting procedure, the quoted EPR concentrations are estimated to be ± 10%.

b

Samples of 1 typically contained 90% FeIV =O species, with the remainder of the iron belonging to an unreactive byproduct, which was also found in samples derived from 1.

c

A second Mössbauer sample for characterizing the self-decay of 1 contained ca. 40% of the Fe belonging to D1 +D2 and 40% to C. The uncertainties in the Mössbauer quantifications are ca. ± 5%.

d

The z axis of the EFG tensor is tilted by β = 50° (towards the x axis )with respect to the z-axis of the ZFS tensor.