Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Vet Parasitol. 2010 Apr 14;171(3-4):286–292. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.006

Table 3.

GLM models – significant associations with prevalence or abundance of parasites in foxes

Parasite Model Fit Significant parameters Value and 95% CIs Parameter type P value
E. multilocularis Binomial GLM (logistic) Age 0.82(0.65–0.99) Odds ratio 0.043
E. multilocularis Zero-inflated Negative binomial GLM Age (zero-inflated) 1.28 (1.01–1.62) Odds ratio 0.042
k 0.26(0.19–0.37)
Dipylidium caninum Negative binomial GLM Age 0.57 (0.37–0.81) Incidence rate Ratio <0.0001
Presence of E. multilocularis 3.81(1.35–10.16) Incidence Rate Ratio 0.008
Presence of T. leonina 0.13(0.02–0.80) Incidence Rate Ratio 0.028
k 0.13(0.08–0.17)

Incidence Rate Ratio. This is the parameter in a negative binomial generalised linear model. For a continuous variable such as age it is the proportional change in parasite count for each year. Thus, for each 1 year increase in age the abundance of D. caninum parasites decreases by 57%. For a binomial variable such as presence of E. multilocularis it is the ratio of D. caninum parasite counts between those foxes infected with E. multilocularis and those non-infected.