Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 9;92(2):422–427. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29406

TABLE 2.

Type 2 diabetes according to egg consumption

No. of events
Incidence rate
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
1
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
2
Egg intake Men (n = 1669) Women (n = 2229) Men (n = 1669) Women (n = 2229) Men (n = 1669) Women (n = 2229) Men (n = 1669) Women (n = 2229)
Never 13 31 6.53 7.82 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
<1/mo 15 24 7.34 6.54 1.05 (0.50, 2.21) 0.82 (0.48, 1.40) 0.95 (0.45, 2.01) 0.77 (0.43, 1.38)
1–3/mo 46 64 8.55 6.19 1.28 (0.69, 2.37) 0.79 (0.51, 1.21) 1.14 (0.60, 2.15) 0.73 (0.47, 1.14)
1–4/wk 54 48 7.83 5.78 1.15 (0.63, 2.10) 0.73 (0.47, 1.15) 0.96 (0.50, 1.82) 0.76 (0.47, 1.23)
Almost daily 14 4 15.53 6.92 2.45 (1.15, 5.22) 0.78 (0.27, 2.20) 1.81 (0.77, 4.22) 0.38 (0.10, 1.37)
P for trend 0.57 0.16
1

Adjusted for age and race by using Cox proportional hazards regression.

2

Adjusted for age, race (black or nonblack), BMI, smoking status (former, never, or current), alcohol consumption (never, former, <7 drinks/wk, or ≥7 drinks/wk), physical activity (in kcal), cereal-fiber intake (energy-adjusted quintiles), and field center by using Cox proportional hazards regression.