Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 2.

Treatment Year 1 (1998 with the Exception of Maryland, 1999)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 5/26–6/5/98 15 19.2 (0.6) 15 30.3 (1.9) 7.3 −0.52
2 RI 6/9–6/26/98 15 22.6 (0.9) 15 30.4 (1.9) 7.4 −0.34
3 RI 7/3–7/14/98 15 27.9 (1.2) 15 30.6 (1.6) 7.5 −0.13
4 RI 7/16–7/24/98 15 20.1 (1.2) 15 29.7 (1.6) 7.3 −0.45
5 CT 5/11–5/15/98 13 31 (3) 6 10 (2) 4.1 0.28
6 CT 5/25–6/3/98 16 160 (6) 8 41 (5) 5.0 0.81
7 CT 6/8–6/11/98 16 343 (34) 8 67 (5) 5.2 0.45
8 CT 6/22–6/29/98 16 330 (46) 8 47 (7) 5.3 0.38
9 CT 7/6–7/7/98 16 136 (6) 8 58 (4) 5.3 0.23
10 CT 7/20–7/24/98 16 51 (3) 9 23 (3) 5.7 0.21
11 CT 8/3–8/6/98 16 40 (3) 9 43 (7) 5.6 −0.46
12 NY 6/4–6/11/98 9 5.1 (0.5) 15 19.1 (2.4) 5.5 −0.35
13 NY 6/18–7/27/98 17 17.1 (0.6) 23 12.1 (0.5) 8.9 0.90
14 NY 7/23–9/1/98 18 29.0 (1.9) 16 16.0 (1.2) 8.3 0.38
15 NJ 5/19/98 25 28 (2) 20 55 (4) 10.7 −0.56
16 NJ 5/26/98 25 86 (3) 20 141 (6) 10.4 −0.73
17 NJ 6/1/98 25 75 (2) 20 412 (69) 10.9 −0.38
18 NJ 6/8/98 25 49 (2) 20 122 (8) 10.4 −0.72
19 MD 6/1/99 15 142 (10) 15 297.1 (11.0) 6.7 −0.98
20 MD 6/8/99 15 240 (16) 15 410.3 (21.3) 7.2 −0.58
21 MD 6/16/99 15 306 (19) 15 396.4 (20.0) 7.4 −0.30
22 MD 6/22/99 15 153 (10) 15 287.6 (10.7) 6.9 −0.85

SD, standard deviation.