Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 3.

Treatment Year 2 (1999 with the Exception of Maryland, 2000)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 5/26–6/1/99 15 18.9 (0.9) 15 22.1 (1.5) 7.5 −0.17
2 RI 6/3–6/8/99 15 14.4 (0.9) 15 24.4 (1.6) 7.3 −0.49
3 RI 6/14–6/21/99 15 13.7 (0.7) 15 12.3 (0.7) 7.5 0.12
4 RI 6/24–6/30/99 15 5.7 (0.3) 15 20.2 (1.3) 6.7 −1.00
5 CT 5/17–5/20/99 16 36 (3) 12 45 (3) 6.7 −0.48
6 CT 6/2–6/3/99 16 60 (4) 12 74 (5) 6.6 −0.53
7 CT 6/14/99 16 83 (5) 12 35 (3) 6.7 0.50
8 CT 6/28/99 16 48 (2) 12 54 (4) 6.7 −0.50
9 CT 7/12/99 16 8 (1) 12 24 (2) 6.0 −1.09
10 CT 7/26/99 16 22 (1) 12 14 (2) 6.8 0.13
11 NY 5/12–6/25/99 26 75.0 (2.9) 35 65.1 (1.6) 14.6 0.45
12 NY 7/7–8/18/99 24 42.9 (1.3) 24 28.0 (1.3) 11.7 0.48
13 NJ 5/26/99 25 41 (2) 20 120 (8) 10.3 −0.78
14 NJ 6/1/99 25 43 (3) 20 110 (6) 10.3 −0.81
15 NJ 6/8/99 25 73 (3) 20 67 (4) 11.1 −0.10
16 NJ 6/15/99 25 80 (4) 20 174 (9) 10.4 −0.77
17 MD 6/9/00 15 108 (5) 15 365.0 (21.1) 6.5 −1.08
18 MD 6/20/00 15 102 (6) 15 232.1 (9.3) 6.5 −1.08
19 MD 6/27/00 15 40 (3) 15 196.4 (7.8) 5.5 −1.71
20 MD 6/30/00 15 34 (2) 15 160.6 (6.4) 5.4 −1.75

SD, standard deviation.