Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 4.

Treatment Year 3 (2000 with the Exception of Maryland, 2001)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 5/30–6/15/00 15 31.9 (0.8) 15 58.3 (3.0) 7.0 −0.77
2 RI 6/21–7/6/00 15 33.7 (1.0) 15 45.4 (2.3) 7.3 −0.43
3 RI 7/17–7/24/00 15 30.5 (1.1) 15 41.2 (2.1) 7.3 −0.41
4 RI 8/6–8/23/00 15 46.2 (2.5) 15 57.2 (2.9) 7.4 −0.27
5 CT 5/22/00 15 48 (3) 12 74 (6) 6.4 −0.63
6 CT 6/5/00 15 122 (8) 12 47 (3) 6.4 0.62
7 CT 6/19–6/22/00 15 76 (4) 12 94 (6) 6.4 −0.55
8 CT 7/3/00 15 48 (3) 12 80 (5) 6.1 −0.83
9 CT 7/17/00 15 39 (2) 12 88 (6) 5.8 −1.07
10 CT 7/31–8/1/00 13 19 (2) 12 18 (2) 6.2 −0.02
11 NY 5/25–6/2/00 13 30.1 (1.5) 11 35.1 (1.8) 5.8 −0.51
12 NY 6/20–6/28/00 21 18.5 (0.8) 13 14.1 (0.8) 8.0 −0.26
13 NJ 5/24/00 25 28 (1) 20 102 (6) 9.9 −1.02
14 NJ 5/30/00 25 46 (2) 20 74 (4) 10.6 −0.64
15 NJ 6/8/00 25 35 (2) 20 114 (6) 9.9 −1.00
16 NJ 6/15/00 25 59 (2) 20 91 (4) 10.6 −0.65
17 MD 6/4/01 15 126 (8) 15 262.1 (12.4) 6.9 −0.85
18 MD 6/11/01 15 109 (8) 15 406.6 (16.9) 5.9 −1.45
19 MD 6/18/01 15 101 (6) 15 357.0 (18.2) 6.3 −1.23
20 MD 6/26/01 15 61 (3) 15 341.6 (17.7) 6.0 −1.44

SD, standard deviation.