Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 5.

Treatment Year 4 (2001 with the Exception of Maryland, 2002)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 6/1–7/2/01 15 25.3 (0.9) 15 52.3 (3.2) 7.0 −0.75
2 RI 7/3–7/25/01 15 19.6 (1.0) 15 44.2 (2.0) 6.7 −1.00
3 RI 7/31–8/3/01 15 14.4 (1.0) 15 27.6 (1.5) 7.1 −0.66
4 CT 5/28/01 16 45 (4) 13 72 (7) 7.0 −0.49
5 CT 6/18/01 16 74 (5) 14 98 (6) 7.3 −0.42
6 CT 7/9/01 16 35 (4) 14 58 (2) 7.1 −0.65
7 CT 7/23/01 16 4 (1) 14 38 (3) 6.5 −1.07
8 CT 8/6/01 16 7 (1) 14 18 (1) 6.6 −1.01
9 NY 5/8–8/23/01 197 164.1 (1.0) 173 398.6 (2.1) 83.4 −0.92
10 NJ 5/24–5/25/01 25 80 (3) 20 95 (4) 10.9 −0.43
11 NJ 5/28–5/30/01 25 82 (3) 20 174 (9) 10.3 −0.79
12 NJ 6/1–6/3/01 25 48 (3) 20 121 (5) 9.8 −1.02
13 NJ 6/5–6/8/01 25 47 (3) 20 150 (9) 10.1 −0.89
14 MD 6/4/02 15 43 (3) 15 175.2 (7.2) 5.8 −1.54
15 MD 6/11/02 15 71 (5) 15 146.0 (6.9) 6.9 −0.81
16 MD 6/13/02 15 60 (5) 15 154.0 (9.1) 6.9 −0.84
17 MD 6/18/02 15 37 (2) 15 195.6 (9.2) 5.8 −1.53

SD, standard deviation.