Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 6.

Treatment Year 5 (2002 with the Exception of Maryland, 2003)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 6/6–6/21/02 15 15.6 (0.8) 15 36.9 (1.8) 6.7 −0.98
2 RI 6/25–7/1/02 15 16.2 (0.7) 15 39.2 (2.1) 6.7 −0.95
3 RI 7/8–7/12/02 15 11.3 (0.5) 15 35.3 (2.0) 6.6 −1.05
4 RI 7/19–7/26/02 15 8.4 (0.4) 15 21.3 (1.1) 6.6 −1.04
5 CT 5/20/02 16 45 (5) 14 53 (3) 7.4 −0.22
6 CT 6/3/02 16 29 (2) 14 59 (3) 6.7 −0.93
7 CT 6/17/02 16 13 (1) 14 75 (5) 6.2 −1.28
8 CT 7/1/02 16 22 (1) 14 26 (2) 7.4 −0.28
9 CT 7/15/02 16 16 (1) 14 20 (3) 7.4 −0.21
10 NY 5/16–7/25/02 29 9.1 (0.4) 30 25.0 (1.1) 14.0 −0.63
11 NJ 5/19–5/26/02 25 20 (1) 20 79 (5) 14.0
10.2
−0.84
12 NJ 5/29–5/31/02 25 40 (2) 20 139 (8) 10.0 −0.93
13 NJ 6/1–6/5/02 25 40 (2) 20 147 (11) 10.3 −0.78
14 NJ 6/7–6/11/02 25 53 (3) 20 165 (8) 9.8 −1.05
15 MD 6/9/2003 15 89 (7) 15 215.4 (11.4) 6.9 −0.87
16 MD 6/12/2003 15 85 (4) 15 192.0 (10.5) 6.9 −0.87
17 MD 6/17/2003 15 113 (6) 15 218.3 (11.8) 7.0 −0.74
18 MD 6/23/2004 15 90 (5) 15 178.9 (9.4) 7.0 −0.78

SD, standard deviation.