Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;9(4):423–430. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150

Table 7.

Treatment Year 6 (2003)

 
 
 
Treatment
Control
 
 
Comparison Site Date Samples Nymphs (SD) Samples Nymphs (SD) Weight Effect size
1 RI 6/8–6/21/03 15 10.9 (0.42) 15 25.2 (1.1) 6.5 −1.14
2 RI 6/24–7/1/03 15 10.5 (0.4) 15 26.4 (1.4) 6.6 −1.02
3 RI 7/9–7/17/03 15 9.5 (0.3) 15 26.6 (1.2) 6.3 −1.23
4 RI 7/19–7/26/03 15 8.3 (0.4) 15 18.5 (0.9) 6.7 −0.95
5 CT 5/12/03 16 6 (1) 13 9 (1) 7.1 −0.31
6 CT 6/2/03 16 35 (2) 13 51 (3) 6.8 −0.66
7 CT 6/23/03 16 17 (1) 13 50 (5) 6.7 −0.74
8 CT 7/7/03 16 13 (1) 13 24 (4) 7.1 −0.35
9 CT 7/21/03 16 4 (1) 13 17 (1) 6.4 −0.98
10 CT 8/11/03 16 6 (1) 13 13 (1) 6.9 −0.57
11 NY 5/13–8/28/02 76 23.5 (0.4) 67 107.3 (2.3) 33.0 −0.80
12 NJ 5/13–5/20/03 25 3 (0.3) 20 51 (2) 8.8 −1.47
13 NJ 5/30–6/3/03 25 42 (2) 20 140 (7) 9.7 −1.10
14 NJ 6/7–6/10/03 25 30 (2) 20 103 (4) 8.9 −1.44
15 NJ 6/11–6/12/03 25 38 (2) 20 133 (8) 10.0 −0.95

SD, standard deviation.