Table 1.

Stroke subject characteristics

					Motion/strength			Somatosensation
	Age, yr	Sex	Dur, mo	Lesion	DF	PF	Refl PF	Cutan	Proprio	LE FMA	Antiphase score
S1	59.4	F	66	L subc	Partial	Good	2+	Intact	Intact	27	2
S2	62.9	F	51	R subc	Partial	Partial	2+	Impaired	Intact	21	1
S3	37.2	M	69	L cort	Partial	Partial	3	Impaired	Impaired	22	2
S4	71.9	M	73	L cort	Partial	Partial	2+	Impaired	Impaired	18	1
S5	53.5	F	91	R subc	Partial	Partial	NT	Impaired	Intact	24	1
S6	69.7	M	250	L cort	Partial	Partial	2+	Impaired	Impaired	NT	3
S7	61.0	F	139	R subc	Partial	Good	2	Absent	Impaired	26	3
S8	67.4	M	128	L cort	Partial	Partial	4	Absent	Absent	16	0
	60.4 ± 11.1		108.4 ± 65.0							22.0 ± 4.0

Leftmost column represents the stroke subject number. Lesions were grossly categorized as either cortical (cort) or subcortical (subc), depending on whether the sensorimotor cortex was damaged. Antiphase scores indicate the number of trials (of 3) in which the subject correctly executed the antiphase pattern. Cutan, cutaneous; DF, dorsiflexion; Dur, duration (since stroke); F, female; L, left; M, male; mo, months; NT, not tested; PF, plantarflexion; Proprio, proprioception; R, right; Refl, deep tendon reflex; yr, years; LE FMA, lower extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Bottom row, group means ± 1 SD.