Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 14;5(7):e11588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011588

Table 2. Estimated effect of dietary factors on annual change in “waist circumference for a given body mass index (ΔWCBMI, cm/y)”.

Men Women
β1 (95% CI) P β1 (95% CI) P
Total Energy (kcal) −0.00 (−0.00 to 0.00) 0.40 0.00 (−0.00 to 0.00) 0.44
Energy Density (kcal/g) 2 0.09 (0.05 to 0.13) <0.001 0.15 (0.09 to 0.21)* <0.001
Carbohydrates (5% E) 3 −0.01 (−0.02 to 0.00) 0.26 −0.01 (−0.02 to −0.00) 0.05
Protein (5% E) 3 −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.03) 0.54 −0.03 (−0.06 to 0.01) 0.13
Fat (5% E) 3 0.01 (−0.00 to 0.02) 0.06 0.02 (−0.00 to 0.04) 0.08
Alcohol (5% E) 3 0.01 (−0.00 to 0.02) 0.25 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) 0.003
Glycemic Index (10 unit) 4 0.07 (0.03 to 0.12) 0.002 0.06 (0.03 to 0.10) 0.001
Glycemic Load (50 units) 5 0.05 (−0.02 to 0.13) 0.187 0.09 (0.01 to 0.17) 0.030
Fibre (10 g) 6 −0.01 (−0.03 to 0.01) 0.24 −0.06 (−0.08 to −0.03) <0.001

% E  =  Percentage of total energy intake provided by each nutrient.

1

The association between nutrient intake and ΔWCBMI was modelled using centre-specific linear regression [adjusting for: age, baseline weight, baseline height, baseline WCBMI, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, education, follow-up duration, menopausal status (women only), and hormone replacement therapy use (women only)], and random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate heterogeneity (I 2) across study centres and to obtain pooled estimates of the associations.

*indicates that there is heterogeneity across study centres (P for heterogeneity <0.05).

2

further adjusted for energy derived from drinks.

3

further adjusted for total energy.

4

further adjusted for fibre, carbohydrate, fat, and protein.

5

further adjusted for fibre, fat, protein, and total energy.

6

further adjusted for glycemic index, carbohydrate, fat, and protein.