Table 2. Estimated effect of dietary factors on annual change in “waist circumference for a given body mass index (ΔWCBMI, cm/y)”.
Men | Women | |||||
β1 | (95% CI) | P | β1 | (95% CI) | P | |
Total Energy (kcal) | −0.00 | (−0.00 to 0.00) | 0.40 | 0.00 | (−0.00 to 0.00) | 0.44 |
Energy Density (kcal/g) 2 | 0.09 | (0.05 to 0.13) | <0.001 | 0.15 | (0.09 to 0.21)* | <0.001 |
Carbohydrates (5% E) 3 | −0.01 | (−0.02 to 0.00) | 0.26 | −0.01 | (−0.02 to −0.00) | 0.05 |
Protein (5% E) 3 | −0.02 | (−0.06 to 0.03) | 0.54 | −0.03 | (−0.06 to 0.01) | 0.13 |
Fat (5% E) 3 | 0.01 | (−0.00 to 0.02) | 0.06 | 0.02 | (−0.00 to 0.04) | 0.08 |
Alcohol (5% E) 3 | 0.01 | (−0.00 to 0.02) | 0.25 | 0.02 | (0.01 to 0.03) | 0.003 |
Glycemic Index (10 unit) 4 | 0.07 | (0.03 to 0.12) | 0.002 | 0.06 | (0.03 to 0.10) | 0.001 |
Glycemic Load (50 units) 5 | 0.05 | (−0.02 to 0.13) | 0.187 | 0.09 | (0.01 to 0.17) | 0.030 |
Fibre (10 g) 6 | −0.01 | (−0.03 to 0.01) | 0.24 | −0.06 | (−0.08 to −0.03) | <0.001 |
% E = Percentage of total energy intake provided by each nutrient.
The association between nutrient intake and ΔWCBMI was modelled using centre-specific linear regression [adjusting for: age, baseline weight, baseline height, baseline WCBMI, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, education, follow-up duration, menopausal status (women only), and hormone replacement therapy use (women only)], and random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate heterogeneity (I 2) across study centres and to obtain pooled estimates of the associations.
*indicates that there is heterogeneity across study centres (P for heterogeneity <0.05).
further adjusted for energy derived from drinks.
further adjusted for total energy.
further adjusted for fibre, carbohydrate, fat, and protein.
further adjusted for fibre, fat, protein, and total energy.
further adjusted for glycemic index, carbohydrate, fat, and protein.