Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr;88(4):367–371. doi: 10.1177/0022034509334203

Table 1.

Demographic Variables, Implant Location, and Bone Type by Glycemic Levels (HbA1c)

Participants
Implants
Gender
Age (yrs)
Location
Bone Type (no. of implants)
HbA1c at 8 wks n n Number female Mean ± SE Number mandible Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
≤6.0 10 12 7 45.7 ± 3.1b 7 4 3 5 0
6.1 to 8 12 18 6 66.0 ± 2.2 12 0 7 10 1
8.1 to 10 5 5 2 54.4 ± 1.7 3 0 2 1 2
≥10.1 5 7 2 64.0 ± 5.1 5 2 2 2 1
Total number 32 42 17c 27d 6 14e 18e 4
Significancea p = 0.7094 p = 0.0001 p = 0.9277 p = 0.0610
a

Test of equality of HbA1c groups.

b

HbA1c ≤ 6.0 significantly (p ≤ 0.05, Scheffé’s multiple-comparison procedure) different from combined 6.1 to 8.0, 8.1 to 10.0, and ≥10.1.

c

53.1% of participants were female.

d

64.3% of implants were in the mandible.

e

76.2% of implants were in types II or III bone.