Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2006 Nov;15(13):4141–4151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03068.x

Table 1.

Mice sampled, levels of multiple paternity, and observed and expected heterozygosities for each locality

Locality #mice* #mothers* #embryos* #mp litters Mdist (km) HE§ HO P-value**
Arizona
    (all) 519 (33) 62 (7) 343 (26) 16 16 0.80 0.68 < 0.001
    (nonzoo) 212 (15) 22 (2) 121 (13) 3 16 0.79 0.71 < 0.001
    (zoo) 307 (18) 40 (5) 222 (13) 13 0.1 0.75 0.66 < 0.001
Iowa 72 9 63 1 0.1 0.65 0.64 0.56
Maryland 143 (13) 23 (3) 120 (10) 5 unknown 0.65 0.54 < 0.001
New Hampshire 11 2 9 0 0.1 NA†† NA†† NA††
New Jersey 202 (11) 34 (3) 168 (8) 8 0.1 0.67 0.64 < 0.006
Tennessee 64 9 55 1 0.1 0.58 0.58 0.72
Australia 84 11 73 2 1150 0.71 0.55 < 0.001
Total 1095 143 831 33
*

Numbers in parentheses indicate litters which either showed evidence of mutational events or only had two embryos; these litters were excluded from studies of multiple paternity (see text).

The number of litters that showed evidence of multiple paternity.

The maximum distance between collecting localities within a population.

§

Expected frequency of heterozygotes. Average HE = 0.69.

Observed frequency of heterozygotes. Average HO = 0.62.

**

Significant departures from expected and observed frequency of heterozygotes judged by Markov chain permutation tests (see text).

††

Not applicable since expected and observed heterozygosities could not be reliably estimated from only two mothers.