Table 2.
Locus | Sample1 | N2 | p03 | R2 4 | α5 | SE6 | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs29025985 | DTE | 812 | 0.68 | 0.0075 | -0.131 | 0.053 | 0.0135 |
rs29025981 | DTE | 859 | 0.32 | 0.0091 | 0.147 | 0.053 | 0.0052 |
ss161109814 | DTE | 1037 | 0.40 | 0.0053 | 0.109 | 0.046 | 0.0188 |
BRM | 526 | 0.06 | 0.0115 | -0.309 | 0.125 | 0.0140 | |
ss161109797 | BRM | 526 | 0.05 | 0.0105 | -0.332 | 0.141 | 0.0188 |
rs29023635 | DTE | 914 | 0.69 | 0.0069 | -0.127 | 0.05 | 0.0119 |
rs29023639 | COM | 181 | 0.01 | 0.0244 | -1.476 | 0.698 | 0.0359 |
rs29014770 | BRM | 544 | 0.99 | 0.0085 | 0.601 | 0.279 | 0.0317 |
1 DTE - dairy tick experiment, BRM - Brahman, COM - Tropical Composite.
2 Number of individuals tested.
3 Frequency of the allele closer to A in the alphabet.
4 Proportion of residual variance explained.
5 Allele substitution effect in phenotypic standard deviations (tick count for the DTE and tick score for BRM and COM).
6 Standard error of α.