Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2009 Fall;6(3):93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.06.001

Table I.

Model systems for evaluating biological pacemaker channels

In Vivo In Vitro In Silico
Pro Most predictive of therapeutic outcome, particularly when large animal models are employed Suitable for detailed biophysical characterization; can obtain both rate and rhythm information when employing a myocyte culture Fastest and most economical means to compare different biophysical properties; can provide insight into which channel parameters are most useful to modify
Con Expensive and time consuming if comparing many channel constructs Removed from intact animal situation; rate and rhythm information still fairly time consuming to acquire; ideally should employ localized expression, which is more difficult Highly dependent on accuracy of the model, particularly regarding non-equilibrium behavior of expressed channel; also dependent on accurate biophysical data from in vitro studies