Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 28;2010:868976. doi: 10.1155/2010/868976

Table 5.

Experiment 4: mean correlations of subject-specific FC spatial maps with (1) the task-related GLM map for the same subject (“Task-Related” column) and (2) the group IC of interest (“Group IC” column). Results of a paired t-test comparison of the mean correlations are shown in the rightmost columns. These results were based on a group ICA that produced 5 components.

Method of Generating Maps Group ICA Source Mean Correlation With Subject-Specific Map (95% Confidence Interval) Same = Seed Null Hypothesis Test
Task-Related Group ICA t df P
Single-voxel seed (SV) PICA 0.57 (0.45–0.68) 0.47 (0.43–0.51) 2.0 13 .06
9-voxel ROI seed (FV) PICA 0.81 (0.73–0.86) 0.53 (0.49–0.57) 5.8 13 <.001
40-voxel ROI seed (MV) PICA 0.83 (0.77–0.87) 0.56 (0.52–0.60) 7.0 13 <.001
Dual regression, 1 spatial map (DRS) PICA 0.77 (0.67–0.83) 0.59 (0.57–0.61) 3.7 13 .002
Dual regression, all spatial maps (DRA) PICA 0.57 (0.46–0.65) 0.62 (0.59–0.64) −1.2 13 .24