Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2010 May;67(5):532–537. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181d4ff4d

Table 3.

Watermaze testing performance

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Probe
(Day 6)
n latency* latency latency latency latency quad%
SAL+3h dHT 18 51 ± 6 45 ± 9 42 ± 12 40 ± 13 35 ± 14 35 ± 16
PB+3h dHT 17 51 ± 6 45 ± 10 38 ± 11 35 ± 14 32 ± 13 38 ± 19
*

Mean escape latency (sec., ± SD) to reach the platform, of 8 trials/day/rat, maximum 60 sec.

By repeated measures ANOVA there was no between-group difference in escape latency, however rats in both groups exhibited a decrease in mean escape latency over time (p<0.0001 for testing day), i.e. both groups exhibited evidence of learning.

Mean (±SD) percent of total swim time spent in virtual quadrant that formerly contained platform. No between-group difference was detected.