Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 29;10:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-202

Table 3.

Genetic diversity and results of mutation-drift equilibrium tests for each gene

Genes [populations] N L S SI SS SA A Hd θπ θw rho D D* F* FS
CguPIP1.1 [NW] 58 673 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 - - - - -
CguPIP1.1 [SE] 12 673 8 7 (3) 1 0 2 0.53 4.24 2.65 0 2.40 * 1.38 * 1.87 * 7.51 *
PquPIP2.1 32 513 16 10 6 0 7 0.79 4.63 3.97 5 0.56 1.57 * 1.46 2.76 *
VsePIP2.1 46 627 10 7 (2) 2 1 17 0.89 2.72 2.27 47 0.56 0.20 0.37 - 7.48
EfaPIP1.1 [NW] 104 459 12 10 (2) 2 0 19 0.87 3.27 2.30 59 1.11 * 0.83 1.11 * - 4.20 *
EfaPIP1.1 [SE] 50 459 12 9 (2) 3 0 12 0.86 3.48 2.68 14 0.89 0.94 1.08 - 1.00
EfaPIP1.2 [NW] 144 521 9 6 (1) 1 2 11 0.72 3.14 3.19 8 - 0.55 1.29 0.98 - 1.94
EfaPIP1.2 [SE] 60 521 8 6 (1) 1 2 11 0.63 2.61 3.29 18 - 0.55 1.29 * 0.81 - 4.41
EfaPIP2.1 [NW] 106 572 5 2 (1) 1 2 6 0.73 2.52 1.67 6 1.07 * 1.03 1.23 0.88
EfaPIP2.1 [SE] 60 572 4 1 (1) 1 2 4 0.66 2.20 1.50 0 1.02 0.98 1.16 1.73
EgrPIP2.1 194 671 14 9 (1) 2 3 10 0.23 1.21 2.40 0 - 1.24 1.53 * 0.58 - 2.11

Legend: Analyses were performed taking recombination into account. N = sample size (number of sequences); L = amplicons length (base pairs); S = total number of segregating sites; SI = number of sites segregating in introns (number of indels in parentheses); SS = number of synonymous sites segregating in exons; SA = number of non-synonymous sites segregating in exons; A = number of observed haplotypes; Hd = Nei's (1987) gene diversity computed on haplotype frequencies; θπ, θw = estimates of population diversity parameter (4Neμ) from pairwise nucleotide differences and number of segregating sites, respectively (Tajima 1989); values multiplied by 1000; rho = population recombination parameter (4Ner); D, D*, F*, Fs: standard neutral model statistics (see Materials and Methods). * = significant and the P = 0.05 threshold level. n.b. some significant values of FS are numerically negative but lie above the upper limit of the neutral confidence interval (see Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S1); they are therefore "statistically positive".