Table 3. Implementation of Project TND, by Type of Organization (in percents).
| Total Sample | School Organization | Non-School Organization | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting for Program* | (n=120) | (n=44) | (n=76) |
| Regular middle school | 15 | 9.1 | 18.4 |
| Regular high school | 50.8 | 63.6 | 43.4 |
| Alternative school | 50.8 | 84.6 | 50 |
| Community setting | 24.2 | 9.1 | 32.9 |
| Other (e.g. juvenile justice) | 18.3 | 15.9 | 19.7 |
| Type of Implementera | (n=110) | (n=41) | (n=69) |
| Classroom Teacher | 30 | 68.3 | 7.3 |
| Prevention Specialist | 25.5 | 4.9 | 37.7 |
| Health Educator | 16.4 | 7.3 | 21.7 |
| Counselor or Therapist | 25.5 | 14.6 | 31.9 |
| Other (e.g. Nurse) | 2.5 | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Training of Implementers | (n=106) | (n=38) | (n=68) |
| Completed certified USC training | 44.3 | 52.7 | 39.7 |
| Non-USC training or no formal training | 55.7 | 47.3 | 60.3 |
| Sources of Grant Funding for TND*a | (n=120) | (n=44) | (n=76) |
| Safe & Drug Free Schools funds | 25 | 34.1 | 19.7 |
| Other federal grant | 16.7 | 20.5 | 14.5 |
| State grant | 11.7 | 22.7 | 5.3 |
| Other source (e.g. County funded) | 48.3 | 27.3 | 60.5 |
Notes:
*
Percentages do not add up to 100 because respondents could check all that apply.
a
Difference between two organization types, p <.0001