Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Womens Health Issues. 2010 Jul–Aug;20(4):294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.03.009

Table 3.

Prevalence Ratio (PR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the Association1 between Stress Intensity of Major Life Events (MLE) in the Past 12 Months and Fibroid Status, Uterine Fibroid Study, 1996–1999.

Stress Intensity of MLE Model 1 PR (95% CI) Model 2 PR (95% CI) Model 3 PR (95% CI) Model 4 PR (95% CI)
Black Women N=510 N=503 N=449 N=494
Low 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) 1.0 (0.9, 1.2) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Medium 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.1 (1.0, 1.4)
High 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 1.1 (1.0, 1.4) 1.2 (1.0, 1.4)
P-value 2 0.08 0.06 0.25 0.04
White Women N=357 N=355 N=339 N=353
Low 1.8 (1.2, 2.5) 1.8 (1.3, 2.5) 1.8 (1.3, 2.6) 1.7 (1.2, 2.4)
Medium 1.7 (1.2, 2.4) 1.8 (1.2, 2.5) 1.8 (1.2, 2.5) 1.7 (1.2, 2.4)
High 1.5 (1.1, 2.2) 1.5 (1.1, 2.2) 1.5 (1.0, 2.2) 1.5 (1.0, 2.1)
P-value 2 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
1

Reference group = No events

2

Based on Wald Test for Type 3 GEE Analysis, two-sided

Model 1: Adjusted for age at fibroid diagnosis

Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for age at menarche, BMI, physical activity without chores, No. of Full Term Pregnancies after Age 24

Model 3: Model 2 excluding 16 white women and 54 black women with severe fibroid related symptoms

Model 4: Model 2 adjusted for education, income, and occupational status