Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:171–177. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.171

Table 1.

Features of hemagglutination and PCR-based assays for blood groups antigens.

Hemagglutination
    ■ Value
        ○ The “Gold Standard” method to detect the presence or absence of blood group antigens on RBCs that has served the transfusion community well
        ○ Simple and quick to perform, requires little in the way of equipment, and, when done correctly, has a specificity and sensitivity that is appropriate for the vast majority of transfusions
        ○ Detects mixed populations of RBCs
    ■ Reagents
        ○ Specialized and obtained from immunized patients/donors (polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies) or from immunized mice (monoclonal antibodies)
        ○ Source material is a biohazard and is diminishing
        ○ Cost of FDA-approved, commercially licensed reagents is escalating
        ○ Many antibodies are not commercially available and are characterized (often only partially) by the user and some are limited in volume, weakly reactive, or not available
    ■ Limitations
        ○ Is a subjective test
        ○ Requires use of reliable antisera
        ○ Labor-intensive testing so a relatively small number of donors can be typed for a relatively small number of antigens, which has limited the size of antigen-negative inventories
        ○ Indirect indication of a fetus at risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn
        ○ Difficult to phenotype a recently transfused patient
        ○ Difficult to phenotype RBCs coated with IgG
        ○ Can be difficult to distinguish an alloantibody from an autoantibody in antigen-positive people
        ○ Restricted ability to determine zygosity, especially RHD zygosity in D-positive individuals
DNA testing, including DNA arrays
    ■ Value
        ○ Can be automated
        ○ High throughput because multiple markers are tested simultaneously on one sample
        ○ Computerized interpretation and data entry into a patient/donor data base
        ○ Potential to precisely geno-match donor blood to the patient's type
    ■ Reagents
        ○ Does not require special reagents, which can be readily purchased
    ■ Limitations
        ○ Predict an antigen type; it is recommended that the prediction be confirmed by hemagglutination, particularly if negative for the antigen
        ○ Takes hours
        ○ DNA and hemagglutination test results may not agree
        ○ DNA results from somatic cells and from WBCs may not agree
        ○ More than one genotype can give rise to the same phenotype, especially with the null phenotypes
        ○ There is a high probability that not all alleles in all ethnic populations are known
        ○ For research use only; has not been approved by the FDA as the sole test on which to base decisions regarding patient care